Welcome! Login | Register
 

Derek Jeter, Kobe Bryant, Tom Brady … Russell Wilson?—Derek Jeter, Kobe Bryant, Tom Brady … Russell…

U.S. Unemployment Claims Soar to Record-Breaking 3.3 Million During Coronavirus Crisis—U.S. Unemployment Claims Soar to Record-Breaking 3.3 Million…

Harlem Globetrotters Icon Fred “Curley” Neal Passes Away at 77—Harlem Globetrotters Icon Fred “Curley” Neal Passes Away…

Boredom Busters – 3 Games The Family Needs While The World Waits For Sports—Boredom Busters – 3 Games The Family Needs…

REPORT: 2020 Olympics to be Postponed Due to Coronavirus Emergency—REPORT: 2020 Olympics to be Postponed Due to…

Convicted Rapist Weinstein Has Coronavirus, According to Reports—Convicted Rapist Weinstein Has Coronavirus, According to Reports

“Does Anyone Care About Politics Right Now?”—Sunday Political Brunch March 22, 2020—“Does Anyone Care About Politics Right Now?” --…

U.S. - Canada Border to Close for Non-Essential Travel—U.S. - Canada Border to Close for Non-Essential…

Broken Hearts & Lost Games – How The Coronavirus Affected Me—Broken Hearts & Lost Games – How The…

White House Considering Giving Americans Checks to Combat Economic Impact of Coronavirus—White House Considering Giving Americans Checks to Combat…

 
 

slides: 10 Portland Neighborhoods Where Poverty is Growing Fastest

Friday, December 05, 2014

 

Ten Portland neighborhoods doubled or quickly increased their poverty rates in the last 40 years, according to a new report by the City Observatory

Poverty tracks in Portland more than doubled between 1970 and 2010, with residents inside the tracks tripling to reach almost 23,000, the report revealed. 

Five Portland neighborhoods, organized by census tracks, had poverty rates grow from under 15 percent in 1970 to over 30 percent by 2010. Another five neighborhoods recently reached poverty levels of 30 percent in the last 40 years, according to City Observatory, a Portland-based urban policy think tank.

“We have people in communities who are frustrated with a lack of opportunity,” said Victor Merced, executive director of Hacienda CDC.“They are constantly bombarded with a negative cycle it’s hard to break out of. [The problem] just feeds on itself, almost like a cancer.” 

Slides Below: Neighborhoods in the Metro Area with Persistent or Rapidly Growing Poverty

Portland's persistent and rapidly growing areas of poverty are located in the city center and inner Northeast  and North Portland. 

Within the entire Portland metro area, other poor neighborhoods were along the river in Vancouver and outer East Portland in Gresham.  

Factors like flat wages and lack of jobs for the uneducated have contributed to increased poverty in Portland, according to Merced. City and community groups are debating new ways to decrease poverty without gentrification. 

Gentrification Not the Answer

Neighborhoods revitalized through gentrification do not do enough to improve the lives of people living in poverty, according to the City Observatory report. 

“Our attention gets captured by gentrification because things happen quickly,” said Joe Cortright, economist and founding director of City Observatory. “We don’t notice the neighborhoods getting poor gradually. We should be focused on what’s causing these neighborhoods to go downhill.” 

Gentrification has happened slowly in Portland over time, according to Carl Abbot, an urban studies and planning research with Portland State University. Many homes in Northeast Portland were devalued during the 1990s after the housing market crashed in the late ‘80s, Abbott said. This allowed homeowners to make quick profits selling their homes, driving up prices and upgrading neighborhoods.   

Although no one can stop gentrification from happening, community leaders are experimenting with ways of improving neighborhoods without displacing poor residents, Merced said. 

“When addressing gentrification, you’re talking about a class battle between the poor versus institutions not of the same make and it’s always the poor who lose out,” Merced said. “If we believe in fairness and equality in this country we ought to be addressing [displacement] in our discussion.” 

Alternative Solutions
Improving support systems for poorer neighborhoods helps produce positive results. 

20 years ago, Hacienda CDC took over the Clara Vista Apartments in the Killingsworth neighborhood, an area with high rates of crime, drug use, and prostitution, Merced said. However, he said after adding low income housing, along with health and community centers, the neighborhood saw a drop in crime and rise in resident moral.

Urban planners have been looking for different routes to stop growing poverty in Portland. 

“It’s an area of a lot of conversation,” Mara Gross, executive director of the Collation for a Livable Future said. “A lot of people and organizations are working to support communities by improving their opportunities in a way that allows people to stay.”

There are a few ways to help neighborhoods without causing displacement, according to Tom Armstrong, supervisor planning with the Portland Bureau of Sustainability and Planning. 

Providing affordable housing for families and increasing job development, especially in sectors that don’t require high levels of education, are effective ways to decrease poverty, Armstrong said. 

Merced said increasing these alternative practices will not only help poor neighborhoods, but the people who live there. 

“People are starting to feel empowered and their lives are better,” Merced said. “It makes a case you can change these neighborhoods around.” 

 

Related Slideshow: 15 Portland Area Neighborhoods With Fastest Growing Poverty

A report from the City Observatory revealed the increasing poverty rates in the Portland metro-area for census tracks. Find which areas saw the highest increases in poverty.

Prev Next

#15

Eliot 

Poverty rate in 1970: 38 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 34 percent
Decrease in poverty rate: 4 percent

Prev Next

#14

Humboldt 

Poverty rate in 1970: 32 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 34 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 2 percent

Prev Next

#13

Buckman

Poverty rate in 1970: 29 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 32 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 3 percent

Prev Next

#12

West Portsmouth

Poverty rate in 1970: 25 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 30 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 5 percent

Prev Next

#11

North King

Poverty rate in 1970: 19 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 31 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 12 percent

Prev Next

#10

South Downtown

Poverty rate in 1970: 25 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 39 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 14 percent

Prev Next

#9

East Cully & North Roseway

Poverty rate in 1970: 15 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 31 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 16 percent

Prev Next

#8

North Downtown 

Poverty rate in 1970: 36 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 52 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 16 percent

Prev Next

#7

Goose Hollow 

Poverty rate in 1970: 21 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 40 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 19 percent

Prev Next

#6

Rockwood & North Centennial in Gresham 

Poverty rate in 1970: 10 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 30 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 20 percent

Prev Next

#5

University Park

Poverty rate in 1970: 10 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 32 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 22 percent

Prev Next

#4

Central Powelhurst-Gilbert

Poverty rate in 1970: 11 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 35 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 24 percent

Prev Next

#3

Maple Wood, Bagley Downs Neighborhood & Meadow Homes Neighborhood in Vancouver 

Poverty rate in 1970: 5 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 31 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 26 percent

Prev Next

#2

Glenfair & South Wilkes 

Poverty rate in 1970: 5 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 34 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 29 percent

Prev Next

#1

Fruit Valley in Vancouver 

Poverty rate in 1970: 5 percent
Poverty rate in 2010: 36 percent
Increase in poverty rate: 31 percent

 
 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 
Delivered Free Every
Day to Your Inbox